Link to Procurement Lawyer. Procurement Lawyer Phones.
 Search Site
      
home page Home  contact us Contact  site map Site Map 
 
go to  My Practice
go to  My Experience
go to  Statutes & Treaties
go to  Decisions &
Agency Documents
go to  Procurement
Regulations
go to  Procurement
Information
go to  Briefs &
Memorandums
go to  Government Contractor
Insights

Briefs & Memorandums
rule

 
go to Supreme Court of the United States Matters
go to United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit Matters
go to United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit Matters
go to United States District Court for the
District of Columbia Matters
go to United States Court of
Federal Claims Matters
go to Federal Agency Boards of
Contract Appeal Matters
go to Federal Aviation Administration Office of
Dispute Resolution for Acquisition Matters
go to Government Accountability Office Matters
go to Comments on Rule-Making
 

These are electronic cop­ies of re­cent­ly-filed briefs and leg­al mem­o­randa. Most are in Adobe Port­able Doc­u­ment For­mat (PDF)PDF Icon. files. The Adobe PDF file for­mat pre­sents these doc­u­ments as they ap­pear in print copy.

Supreme Court of the United States Matters:
Core Concepts Number 03-254, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Core Concepts Number 03-254, Brief for the United States in Oppposition
Core Concepts Number 03-254, Reply Brief in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Order List, December 1st, 2003

back to topBack to top

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Matters:
Precision Images, LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. No. 2008-5106, Plaintiff-Appellant’s Nonconfidential Principal Brief Precision Images, LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. No. 2008-5106, Defendant-Appellee’s Nonconfidential Principal Brief
Precision Images, LLC v. United States, Fed. Cir. No. 2008-5106, Plaintiff-Appellant’s Reply Brief  

back to topBack to top

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Matters:
Hawai`i Orchid Growers Association v. Michael Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., D.C. Cir. No. 06-5208, Appellant’s Final Principal Brief Hawai`i Orchid Growers Association v. Michael Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., D.C. Cir. No. 06-5208, Appellees’ Principal Brief
Hawai`i Orchid Growers Association v. Michael Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., D.C. Cir. No. 06-5208, Appellant’s Final Reply Brief Hawai`i Orchid Growers Association v. Michael Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, et al., D.C. Cir. No. 06-5208, Judgment

back to topBack to top

United States District Court for the District of Columbia Matters:
Hawai`i Orchid Growers Association v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Civil Action No. 04-914 (JR), D.D.C., filed March 24, 2005, Memorandum & Order Granting U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Motion for Summary Judgment Hawai`i Orchid Growers Association v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Civil Action No. 05-1182 (RCL), D.D.C., Memorandum & Order Granting U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed June 29, 2006

back to topBack to top

United States Court of Federal Claims Matters:
Southern Foods, Inc. v. United States, No. 07-210C (Judge Eric G. Bruggink), Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, filed April 6, 2007 Southern Foods, Inc. v. United States, No. 07-210C (Judge Eric G. Bruggink), Response to Motion to Dismiss, filed April 11, 2007
Southern Foods, Inc. v. United States, No. 07-210C (Judge Eric G. Bruggink), Published Opinion, reissued June 21, 2007 Emerald Coast Finest Produce Company, Inc. v. United States, No. 06-742C (Judge Emily C. Hewitt), Memorandum in Support of Claim of Continuing Capacity, filed September 11, 2007
Emerald Coast Finest Produce Company, Inc. v. United States, No. 06-742C (Judge Emily C. Hewitt), Opposition to Claim of Continuing Capacity, filed September 26, 2007 Emerald Coast Finest Produce Company, Inc. v. United States, No. 06-742C (Judge Emily C. Hewitt), Order of Dismissal, filed November 26, 2007
Precision Images, LLC v. United States, No. 07-712C (Judge Margaret M. Sweeney), Post-Award Procurement Protest, filed October 3, 2007 Precision Images, LLC v. United States, No. 07-712C (Judge Margaret M. Sweeney), Brief in Support of Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, filed October 19, 2007
Precision Images, LLC v. United States, No. 07-712C (Judge Margaret M. Sweeney), Brief in Response to Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, filed October 24, 2007 Precision Images, LLC v. United States, No. 07-712C (Judge Margaret M. Sweeney), Brief in Reply to Response to Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, filed October 29, 2007
Precision Images, LLC v. United States, No. 07-712C (Judge Margaret M. Sweeney), Opinion and Order, reissued December 20, 2007 Southeast Restoration, Inc. dba AFTERDISASTER v. United States, No. 07-884C (Judge Lynn J. Bush), Complaint, filed December 18, 2007
Southeast Restoration, Inc. dba AFTERDISASTER v. United States, No. 07-884C (Judge Lynn J. Bush), Status Report, filed May 1, 2008  

back to topBack to top

Federal Agency Boards of Contract Appeal Matters:
GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Decision on Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. Advanced Communication Systems, ASBCA No. 52592, Decision on Motion to Dismiss and on Motion for Sanctions.
Advanced Communication Systems, ASBCA No. 52592, Decision on Motion to Amend. GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Decision on DISA Second Motion for Relief.
Systore Companies, Inc. dba Advanced Communications Systems, ASBCA No. 52592, Decision on Motion for Change of Name and on Motion to Dismiss. GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Main Brief, November 9, 2007.
GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Motion to Strike, November 14, 2007. GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Opposition to Motion to Strike, November 19, 2007.
GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Reply Brief, December 6, 2007. GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, DISA Reply Brief, December 6, 2007.
GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Second Motion to Strike, December 7, 2007. GAP Instrument Corporation, ASBCA No. 55041, Opposition to Second Motion to Strike, December 12, 2007.

back to topBack to top

Federal Aviation Administration Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition Matters:
Contest by Agency Tender Official, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket 05-ODRA-00342C Competitive Sourcing Office’s Opposition to Suspension, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket 05-ODRA-00342C
Additional Comments by Agency Tender Official, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket 05-ODRA-00342C Submission in Support of Suspension Request, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket 05-ODRA-00343C
Opposition by Lockheed Martin Services, Incorporated to Suspension, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket 05-ODRA-00342C Order on Request by Computer Sciences Corporation for Intervention, ODRA Docket No. 05-ODRA-00342C, Docket No. 05-ODRA-00343C
Order on Request by National Association of Air Traffic Specialists for Intervention, ODRA Docket No. 05-ODRA-00342C, Docket No. 05-ODRA-00343C Statement by Competitive Sourcing Office on Memorandum of Agreement With National Association of Air Traffic Specialists, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket No. 05-ODRA-00342C, Docket No. 05-ODRA-00343C
Statement by Agency Tender Official on Memorandum of Agreement With National Association of Air Traffic Specialists, GSBCA 16614-FAA, ODRA Docket No. 05-ODRA-00342C, Docket No. 05-ODRA-00343C Order on Motion to Dismiss Contest for Lack of Standing, Docket No. 05-ODRA-00342C, Docket No. 05-ODRA-00343C
FAA Order Number ODRA-05-340, Docket Nos. 05-ODRA-00342C and 05-ODRA-00343C, Suspension Declined FAA Order Number ODRA-05-348, Docket Nos. 05-ODRA-00342C and 05-ODRA-00343C, Contests Denied
Agency Tender Official James H. Washington, et al. v. Federal Aviation Administration, et al., GSBCA No. 16614-FAA, June 28, 2005, Special Master’s Findings of Fact and Recommendation  

back to topBack to top

Government Accountability Office Matters:
American Fuel Cell & Coated Fabrics Co., B-293001, et al., Intervenor’s Supplemental Comments, November 26, 2003. American Fuel Cell & Coated Fabrics Co., B-293001; B-293020, January 12, 2004.
Management Solutions & Systems, Inc., B-299235, Postaward Procurement Protest filed December 6, 2006.  

back to topBack to top

Comments on Rule-Making:
Hawai`i Orchid Growers 60-Day Notice of Endangered Species Act Violations, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(2)(A)(i), March 31, 2005  

back to topBack to top

And here are republished articles and pre­sen­ta­tions. “Past Per­form­ance Revisited” and “It’s Time to Use the Legislative History of the Fed­er­al Ac­qui­si­tion Regulation” are republished with permission from Where in Federal Contracting?

Arbitration/Mediation As A Governance Option For Interagency Agreements. Do Hearings Make A Difference?
The New Anti-Bundling Rules. A Bad Faith Termination.
Past Performance Revisited. It’s Time to Use the Legislative History of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

You’ll need a copy of the free Adobe® Acrobat® Read­er™ ap­p­li­ca­tion software to view, navigate, and print most of these doc­u­ments. Like­ly many of you have already in­stalled Adobe® Acro­bat® Read­er™. If not, left-click on the icon to down­load your free copy of Adobe® Acro­bat® Reader™ from Adobe Sys­tems, In­cor­po­rated.

Get Acrobat® Reader™.

back to topBack to top

Home | Contact | Site Map | Cornish Flash Presentation
rule
My virtual business card:
My Business Card!
info@procurement-lawyer.com
Office: (202) 466-7008
AV Peer Review Rated.
Bobby WorldWide Approved 508